Archive for February, 2010

Learning about Emma

I recently previewed Discovering Emma, and found myself surprisingly educated. I’m not a history buff; I’ve heard insinuations that Emma Smith and Brigham Young didn’t get along, and that’s about it. So in watching this, I was amazed at what I learned.

I don’t want to spoil it for anyone, but the interviews with the historians and scholars (Susan Easton Black, Gracia Jones, and Paul Smith) brought up information like how Joseph and Emma found they’d been betrayed, which led to the martyrdom. Now many of you probably knew this already, but again, I’ve never delved into the history behind the restoration beyond what was directly connected to the gospel. So think about it: if you’d been betrayed and your husband killed, would you really want to travel out west, possibly with others who mean you harm?

I did always think it was odd that Emma didn’t go west. But the perspective given by these scholars made me see a lot of reasons why she didn’t and why she might have if circumstances had been different. It answers questions about why the RLDS Church was started—and while the scholars assume you know a little bit about it, I was still able to fill in the blanks and understand why that church came about, and learn about Emma’s association with it.

There is Emma’s second marriage to Lewis Bidamon, and the scholars again brought up information that I’d never heard about—some of it answering controversy that I’m sure exists if you’re in the historian circle. I think what I got the most from this DVD was that you can never know and judge a person until you’ve walked in his or her shoes. And Emma walked far, with lots of trials that would break most people. I admire the respect with which each scholar addressed the questions and the respect they each have for Emma. Please share your thoughts as well once you’ve seen Discovering Emma.

Digging The Family Tree: Genealogy is cool again

As I’ve been watching the Olympics this week I keep seeing commercials for a new show about celebrity genealogy that’s coming in March. Then the other day I received an email from a relative serving a Genealogy mission about some other upcoming programming about family history on two other networks. Gone are the days of just sitting in a dark corner scrolling through microfiche (and hoping you don’t get motion sick).

Genealogy is the new breed of reality show. The first show, Who Do You Think You Are?, airs on NBC starting March 5th. Seven celebrities will learn about their ancestry, the research of which has in part been done by members of the Church. One actress, for example, finds out that she is related to a witch from Salem, Massachusetts. Makes me wonder what secrets may be hiding in the branches of my family tree.

BYU Television is airing a show on Monday nights called The Generations Project, in which participants not only learn about their ancestors, but they actually walk in their shoes. A female black law student finds strength by learning about her ancestor who was an inventor back when it was very difficult to do so. She travels to where he lived and learns about his invention and the process he went through to get it patented. Any of us regular joes can apply to be on the show and learn about our ancestors.

Lastly, PBS has just begun airing a series called Faces of America. This show asks the question, what makes America great? What makes us who we are? Harry Louis Gates, Jr., a Harvard scholar, uses the latest genealogical tools and genetics to explore the family histories of 12 renowned Americans. Included are chef Mario Batali, musician Yo-Yo Ma, and Her Magesty Queen Noor of Jordan.

So much of reality TV is about things that seem petty and don’t really matter. These shows featuring genealogy are perhaps an opportunity for participants and viewers alike to gain a prize worth far more than a million dollars. What do you think?

Making It in Hollywood—And Staying Active

I recently read the article below (click on link if you’d like to read it) from MormonTimes.com, and it got me thinking: how do LDS actors balance church activity and “making it” in Hollywood?

The article (http://mormontimes.com/arts_entertainment/movies/?id=13181) focuses on Jon Heder, star of Napoleon Dynamite, Blades of Glory, and the like. He most recently was in When in Rome.

In seeing some of Heder’s films on DVD, I remember him calling out Billy Bob Thornton about some raunchy things Thornton was saying, and then Heder pointing out that he is Mormon. Good for you! Wouldn’t we like to see this from every LDS actor? Or beyond that, have every person stand up for what’s morally right? Ultimately, it’s high school all over: doing what’s right even if the “popular” kids don’t agree.

But back to the question: how do LDS actors balance church activity and their potential careers? Where Heder was especially blessed was that he was an instant star. He had job offers to choose from; many actors do not.

For example, remember the interview we had with Kirby Heyborne last year? Kirby was criticized for taking a job in a beer commercial (in which he never drinks or handles the beer). While drinking beer is obviously something we Mormons don’t do, it was a job for Kirby to provide for his family. And more importantly, Kirby is still an active member of the Church (as is Heder).

Perhaps the balance comes both from the actor and from us as an audience. The actor must weigh his/her roles with their careers and providing for themselves, while choosing to be active in the Church. We as audience members need to remember that actors are still people—the roles they choose are fictional. I’m not condoning any actor taking a role that calls for them to actually participate in things contrary to what we believe. But neither am I saying I should judge whether they are temple-worthy or active.

Being active in the Church really is a choice—it’s one each of us makes, and we’re not all actors. With our own jobs, we might face dilemmas that are similar in spirit to what our actors go through. The only difference is that we’re not in the limelight and aren’t scrutinized as closely. So how do we do it? How do Jon Heder and Kirby Heyborne do it?

Do we choose to put ourselves in tough situations? You hear about all the parties that actors go to—where drinking and smoking are expected behaviors. But does your work have events and parties where everyone is drinking? Actor or not, putting yourself in those environments is a risk. I understand sometimes it is necessary to go—but it’s never necessary to partake.

In my opinion, it’s the little things that help you—actor or not—be active. It’s staying close to the gospel and Heavenly Father through prayer, scripture study, serving in our wards and branches, and helping our fellowman. It’s having a Christ-like attitude—especially being humble, meek and charitable. It’s remembering who you are, and the perfect example of the Savior that we each try to emulate. When facing difficult decisions of “What should I do?,” those little things will help you figure out exactly what the Savior would have you do.

LDS Media meets Technology

I read an article once about three categories of consumers. Essentially, the first group is called the early adopters—consumers who are eager for the next big thing, and quickly embrace it, even if it means paying full price. There’s the second group, the “main-stream” group who won’t pay the premium price to be one of the first to own whatever technology or gadget. These consumers generally wait until the technology seems more solid and worthwhile before buying. The last group is the late adopters, and at times this group is resistant to changing technology. The technology in question has to stick around a long time for this consumer group to buy into it.

So where do LDS consumers fall in? No matter what, I don’t see anything wrong in being part of any of these groups. With three different products or technologies, we might be in three different groups anyway. But perhaps it’d be good to evaluate:

What do you own? Have you bought into Blu-rays? Waiting for downloads to be more solid? Staunch supporter of DVDs? Or still hoping to find movies on VHS?

For books, are paperbacks/hardback books your thing, or the Kindle? eReaders are gaining ground but might be obsolete as more portable devices are integrated to do everything—play music, watch movies, read books, surf the web, etc.

Do you buy CDs, or only digital music, or both?

Does what you buy and what format you buy it in depend on where it comes from? For example, if it’s particularly valuable to you, do you insist on a tangible version of the product? I enjoy movie soundtracks, and find that for a full soundtrack, I want the physical disc, complete with artwork and case. But for a pop song on the radio, I’m content to download it from a service.

Partially why I thought I’d blog about this today is to see where we all want LDS media to go. Are we waiting for Saints and Soldiers on Blu-ray? The only LDS film on Blu-ray so far is Emma Smith—My Story. Will others follow? Do you want them to? Are you looking for Jesus the Christ on the Kindle?

Perhaps we can open this up with comments. Please post and share your thoughts. Pardon the delay in your post showing up—due to spammers, we have to review posts to make sure they’re legitimate.

Thanks, and till next time–